humanuderground banner

International Inquiry into 9-11, Phase One, San Francisco, March 26-28th 2004
International Inquiry into 9-11, Phase One, San Francisco, March 26-28th 2004


"And these blast points, too accurate for Sandpeople. Only Imperial stormtroopers are so precise."

Independent Flight 77 - Pentagon Event Investigation

Comments and Links

For Immediate Release

This is a work in progress
EXPECT CHANGES AND ADDITIONS
Agent Fescado
http://www.humanunderground.com/


Comments and Links

A selesection of comments the 'investigation' has received

Your are undoubtedly the sickest individual that I have ever known. You should be ashamed to think that you are the only one that can decipher the truth out of such a tragedy. Who gave you the right to put such trash on the web and causing greater pain to the survivors and the victims families. Gerald

Hello from the other side of the Pond

I watched the full events of Sept 11th unfold as did the rest of the UK but
have been baffled by the 'missing Boeing' website that did the rounds of
email some months ago.  From the obvious inconsistencies and anomalies
surrounding the Pentagon disaster it seems clear to me that a public inquiry
into this tragedy (and potentially the attack on the twin towers) would seem
like a fundamental requirement in light of the sheer number of people who
died that day.

I'm sure you guys get some pretty extreme rhetoric sent to you along the
lines of being anti-American and that any questioning of the official
version of events is a mark on the memory of the deceased.  However, quite
on the contrary, you should take heart from the fact that unquestioning
patriotism serves no purpose at all and if anything devalues the worth of a
nation.  The search for truth - no mater how difficult that may be - is the
greatest respect one can pay to those who died and the victims that are left
behind to make sense of what happened.  Keep up the good work.

Yours faithfully
John 


Other Investigations

Small Aircraft Theory Presented in Detail by Dick Eastman NOW ONLINE

What convinced me that Flight 77 was not the Killer Jet
by Dick Eastman

LINKS



Revisions and Clarifications

Due to overwhelming confusion and misinterpretation I will be removing extraneous data points and early observations from the main presentation. Image analysis subitted by Ron Harvey shows a corrected flight path with regard to fallen light poles. Studying the analysis more closely leaves me with the impression that the alternate impact point, which I spent so much time pointing out, could be damage resulting from the impact of the engine under the RIGHT wing; it never penetrated the Pentagon. Impact Damage Images : (1) (2) (3)

In response to the recent 'Fescado-Bosankoe' "evidence" I have this to say... I never had it set in stone that I was committed to a smaller aircraft, that's why I removed the F16 comparison in the first place. After Dave began promoting his math and referencing my initial observation, I put the images back up as a matter of research record (et3 and et4). My estimations were very clumsy without taking into account the foreshortening of the attack object, as imaged, caused by the angle of approach (approx 30 deg.) and the angle of the imaging lens. I'm using an unmanned Boeing 757 as the primary drone in this equation because we can establish the automated flight control systems on board that type of aircraft and the ease with which it would convince observers of an American Airlines Flight 77. Of course, other craft could have been employed. I am open to solutions - my investigation will continue to reflect the critical thinking and emerging theories as they present themselves.

If you haven't noticed, this whole thing, (S11) opened the public debate on and demonstration of unmanned aircraft from the start of the Afghan campaign with the Predator, then Global Hawk, and now discussion of the Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle. I expect the risk of hijack will be enough to push for unmanned civil air piloting. The technology is there; the tests were completed. From NASA: "The team tested several prototype GPS Landing System concepts using NASA 557 during 226 automatic approaches and landings." From Boeing: "A fully integrated flight management computer system (FMCS) provides for automatic guidance and control of the 757-200 from immediately after takeoff to final approach and landing. Linking together digital processors controlling navigation, guidance and engine thrust, the flight management system ensures that the aircraft flies the most efficient route and flight profile for reduced fuel consumption, flight time and crew workload. The precision of global positioning satellite system (GPS) navigation, automated air traffic control functions, and advanced guidance and communications features are now available as part of the new Future Air Navigation System (FANS) flight management computer. [757-200]" If this technology was on the planes, then why did they not use this technology to save the day on S11? If you answer that - you will see history doesn't happen by accident.


JUMP TO MAIN S11 PAGE

Sections


W3 page maintained by Agent Fescado