humanuderground banner

International Inquiry into 9-11, Phase One, San Francisco, March 26-28th 2004
International Inquiry into 9-11, Phase One, San Francisco, March 26-28th 2004

"And these blast points, too accurate for Sandpeople. Only Imperial stormtroopers are so precise."

Independent Flight 77 - Pentagon Event Investigation


Future Air Navigation System
A diagram illustrating the Future Air Navigation System

For Immediate Release

This is a work in progress
Agent Fescado


Brief Statement

I hope it is understood that I mean no disrespect to the grieving loved ones of those lost on Flight 77 and at the Pentagon on S11. I respect your hardships fully. I feel that I should make a small statement here since this is getting some rather heavy traffic. I began this project in response to the Hunt the Boeing site, a French research effort into curiosities regarding the Pentagon crash site and the 'official line'. I was intrigued, but offended by the hostile tone of the presentation. I felt I had some more benign speculations to answer complicated questions of my own. I began discussing them on American Patriot Friends Network since that's where I learned of the French site. We were discussing the lack of damage and debris at the Pentagon and the precollapse structure of its walls. Many people were confused. The first reports concerning the event at the Pentagon mentioned things like 'small aircraft' and possible truck bomb. Then the reports and story were marginalized by the Twin Towers coverage. My first guess was that a small helicopter, or the like, crashed there while things were getting chaotic as Continuity of Government measures were being implemnted... Simple human error, but questions of conspiracy and coverup kept presenting themselves as data and official stories conflicted. Why coverup a small aircraft accident? Was it really American Airlines Flight 77 and how do we know that? What happened to AA Flight 77? All I really had was a gut feeling that American Airlines Flight 77 might not have been the the object that impacted the Pentagon. I found it odd and curious that the Pentagon happened to release frames from the security camera, showing footage of the S11 Pentagon Event, within just hours of the developing discussions on American Patriot Friends Network. That footage has been a non-stop source of heated debate. What does it show? What doesn't it show? Do we have all the frames?

An animated look at what the Pentagon security camera captured on S11

An animated look at what the Pentagon security camera captured on S11

The footage frames have been removed from the MSNBC server location as of 20031223 or earlier. - Now why would they do that?

It has occurred to me that the presentation has taken a turn toward the 'extreme.' This was not intentional. I merely started out to debunk the French site, a seemingly simple task with the data available. I rejected most of the 'radical' conspiracy theories out-right, but research has compelled me to look at some very disturbing circumstantial evidence. I still hold a more pro-American viewpoint and at the same time realize the extreme nature of the situation I propose requires the most extreme of measures to be taken only in an emergency as grave as war. This is wartime thinking. This is only speculation. This presentation is in no way intended to prove to the reader a hypothesis of conspiracy. This presentation is intentended to be viewed as a kind of research journal full of interesting information that I as a researcher feel is important within the context of researching curiosities surrounding the Pentagon Event and American Airlines Flight 77's involvement with that incident. The reader is encouraged to explore these topics of consideration on his own.

A Proposed Scenario

In a nutshell... I assume American Airlines Flight 77 was hijacked by terrorists as reported. What I question is the evidence linking Flight 77 to the event at the Pentagon. Specifically, if Flight 77's transponder was off, radar and radio contact also lost, then what evidence do we have that it was in fact Flight 77 that caused the Pentagon event?

We've learned that there exists technology to control and recover a hijacked airliner, even prevent the hijacking all together. We propose (begin extreme speculation) that American Airlines Flight 77 was remotely recovered. It was never near the Pentagon. The terrorists were captured by a waiting hostage rescue team and the passengers are safely sequestered away as special guests of the USG, probably participating in a federal witness security program. This would explain the U.S. reluctance to elaborate on the evidence and methods to link bin Laden. The U.S. has the terrorists captured and no one will know about the remote recovery. The civillians would probably comply; they would not want to seem unpatriotic by messing with a very important investigation while the country is at war, or they would be compelled to comply under some national security clause.

In an effort to conceal the recovery, a suitable distraction needed to be created... We suggest the Pentagon was deliberately struck by an unmanned, drone aircraft to conceal the details and evidence of Flight 77's recovery, an operation of strategic deception. The "planners" targeted the Pentagon specifically to LIMIT casualties. It was a section under renovation without the full compliment of employees; they were mostly military, expected to die for their country and so they did... (Realize: Specific aim points calculated for specific damage patterns were routinely selected and commented on during Gulf2, the Second Gulf War - They are not stupid.) What is implied is that opportunities for deception will be seized if it serves a purpose. The purpose, to effectively hide an American Airlines Flight 77 and her passengers while promoting a known war agenda.

The alternative, given the developing motives and feasiblity, may suggest a more deliberate act on the part of the inside "planners" and less of a mishapped national reaction to a group of suspiciously sweaty arabs on airliners, who happen to leave a trail of clues like a school-yard scavenger-hunt. If the military was somehow stood down and the events of S11 were allowed to occur, or more frightening, planned to occur, then we may have had ourselves a type of coup d'etat, otherwise I question the effectiveness of our national assets.

coup d'tat

Forcible takeover of the government of a country by elements from within that country, generally carried out by violent or illegal means. It differs from a revolution in typically being carried out by a small group (for example, of army officers or opposition politicians) to install its leader as head of government, rather than being a mass uprising by the people. (Tiscali Reference)

coup album cover depicting Twin Towers exploding

This album cover was posted to the internet on July 19, 2001! It depicts the World Trade Center in the exact state we all saw it in after the attacks yesterday. The band, The Coup (a sudden overthrow of a government by a usually small group of persons in positions of authority), displays the Red Communist Star representing Socialism on the cover. (site now removed) (hourofthetime) One person holds 'conductor sticks' to imply orchestration while the other holds a device that says, "COVERT LABS - ENGAGED" Am I seeing this correctly?

The Lone Gunmen


The FOX TV series The Lone Gunmen (X-Files spin off) airs their opening episode "Pilot" six months before 9/11 which depicts a secret U.S. government agency behind a plot to crash a Boeing 727 into the WTC via remote control and blame it on foreign terrorists in the hopes of generating a bigger military budget. (webfairy-killtown)

"What's disturbing about it to me is, you think as a fiction writer that if you can imagine this scenario, then the people in power in the government who are there to imagine disaster scenarios can imagine it, too." - Frank Spotnitz, Co-Producer of The Lone Gunmen

A Known War Agenda?

US Troops ready for Afghanistan war before S11

Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July (2001) that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October... He said that he was in no doubt that after the World Trade Center bombings this pre-existing US plan had been built upon and would be implemented within two or three weeks. And he said it was doubtful that Washington would drop its plan even if Bin Laden were to be surrendered immediately by the Taleban. (BBC)

It's not about Bin Laden -- it's about natural resources

"Audience reaction and anger was strongest as Ruppert presented selected quotes from The Grand Chessboard, a 1997 book by former Carter National Security Advisor and member of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski. Those quotes - along with maps of Central Asia - indicated clearly that the current war had been in the planning stages for at least four years. Two particular quotes from Brzezinski indicating the need for a Pearl Harbor-like attack evoked boos and hisses for the intelligence expert and professor who also served in the Reagan Administration." (Mike Rupert)

The project has been around for some years

Friday, 27 December, 2002, 11:23 GMT
Central Asia pipeline deal signed
By Ian McWilliam
BBC correspondent in Kabul

An agreement has been signed in the Turkmen capital, Ashgabat, paving the way for construction of a gas pipeline from the Central Asian republic through Afghanistan to Pakistan.

The building of the trans-Afghanistan pipeline has been under discussion for some years but plans have been held up by Afghanistan's unstable political situation.


With improved regional security after the fall of the Taleban about a year ago, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan and Pakistan have decided to push ahead with plans for the ambitious 1,500-kilometre-long gas pipeline. bbc

Iraq war planned before S11

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill is the main source for an upcoming book about the Bush White House, "The Price of Loyalty."
"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go... It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying 'Go find me a way to do this.'" Paul O'Neill

Saddam Ouster Planned Early '01?
Jan. 10, 2004
Iraq War Planned Pre-9/11?

(CBS) The Bush Administration began making plans for an invasion of Iraq, including the use of American troops, within days of President Bush's inauguration in January of 2001 -- not eight months later after the 9/11 attacks, as has been previously reported.

That's what former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill says in his first interview about his time as a White House insider. O'Neill talks to CBS News Correspondent Lesley Stahl in the interview, to be broadcast on 60 Minutes, Sunday, Jan. 11 at 7 p.m. ET/PT.

"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go," he tells Stahl. "For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do is a really huge leap."


In the book, O'Neill is quoted as saying he was surprised that no one in a National Security Council meeting questioned why Iraq should be invaded. "It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying 'Go find me a way to do this,'" says O'Neill in the book.

CBS News Correspondent Mark Knoller reported Saturday that, as the White House sees it, O'Neill's remarks are those of a disgruntled former official, and it should not have come as a surprise to O'Neill that the U.S. advocated Saddam's ouster.

In fact, a senior administration official tells CBS News it would have been irresponsible not to plan for Saddam's eventual removal. (cbsnews)


  1. "Preserve Pax Americana"
  2. Maintain Nuclear Strategic Superiority
  3. Develop and Deploy Global Missile Defenses
  4. Control the New "International Commons" of Space and "Cyberspace," and pave the way for the creation of a new military service -- U.S. Space Forces -- with the mission of space control.
  5. Exploit the "Revolution in Military Affairs"
  6. "Secure and expand zones of democratic peace; deter rise of new great-power competitor; defend key regions; exploit transformation of war."
  7. "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." p.63


The U.S. Commission on National Security / 21st Century was chartered to be the most comprehensive examination of the structures and processes of the U.S. national security apparatus since the core legislation governing it was passed in 1947. The Commission's Charter enjoins the Commissioners to "propose measures to adapt existing national security structures" to new circumstances, and, if necessary, "to create new structures where none exist." The Commission is also charged with providing "cost and time estimates to complete these improvements," as appropriate, for what is to be, in sum, "an institutional road map for the early part of the 21 st century." ... The President should propose, and Congress should agree to create, a National Homeland Security Agency (NHSA) with responsibility for planning, coordinating, and integrating various U.S. government activities involved in homeland security. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) should be a key building block in this effort. ... The President should create an implementing mechanism to ensure that the major recommendations of this Commission result in the critical reforms necessary to ensure American national security and global leadership over the next quarter century. Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century (pdf)


X Network Banner ExchangeX Network Banner Exchange

W3 page maintained by Agent Fescado